Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Date: 2006-11-23 17:20:58
Message-ID: 200611231720.kANHKwa16285@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2.  Thanks.
> 
> ... which means test_fsync is now broken.  Why did you apply a patch
> when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?

I thought his code was OK, but the OS had issues.  Clearly we need to
update test_fsync.c because it doesn't match the code.  I have reverted
the patch but some day we need a fixed version.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2006-11-23 18:09:54
Subject: Re: Direct I/O issues
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 16:49:29
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2006-11-23 17:26:12
Subject: Re: [Replica-hooks-discuss] Integrating Replication ino
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 17:10:30
Subject: Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2006-11-23 18:09:54
Subject: Re: Direct I/O issues
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 16:49:29
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group