Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for SPI subtransaction memory leakage

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for SPI subtransaction memory leakage
Date: 2006-11-21 22:48:04
Message-ID: 200611212248.kALMm4G19096@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 00:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Some experimentation shows that there is indeed an issue, eg this
> >> function leaks about 16K per iteration in HEAD:
> 
> > So at 10,000 tpm that leaks a GB of RAM every 7 minutes.
> 
> Uh, no, because it's only an intra-function-call leak.  My request
> for testing the patch is still open though.

This will be improved in 8.2.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 03:52:08
Subject: Re: Shared Memory Hooks Documentation (was Re: New
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-21 21:37:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group