Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-11-18 23:29:07
Message-ID: 200611181529.07429.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Jim,

> That's true of simple query broadcasting (ie: pgpool), but not true  
> of Continuent/Sequoia. Continuent's software adds a lot of additional  
> features on top of simple query broadcasting, making it far more  
> robust than simply spewing queries out to every node in the cluster.  
> You still have to be very careful with how you use it, but not nearly  
> as much as with simpler solutions.

I think the general term is "statement-based replication", not "broadcasting".

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-11-20 09:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-11-17 01:48:58 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-18 23:32:18 Re: Ontology on PostgreSQL - is there something?
Previous Message Kai-Uwe Sattler 2006-11-18 21:37:38 Re: [Fwd: Index Advisor]