Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joachim Wieland" <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> writes:
> > Current beta seems to have the 2006k version of the zic database. The current
> > zic database is version 2006n however. Since this update does not include
> > source code but just data files I would vote to do the update in beta, what
> > do others think?
>
> Sigh, I just updated that six weeks ago ...
Tom has done the zic updates to 2006n.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +