Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hundreds of database and FSM

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hundreds of database and FSM
Date: 2006-11-15 17:42:33
Message-ID: 20061115174233.GA22789@uio.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:31:45PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This is based on our current 150 databases times 20 tables, or 3000 tables 
>> total.  But I wasn't sure if sequences count as "relations", which would 
>> double the number.
> They don't because they don't have free space.

OTOH, indexes do.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Craig A. JamesDate: 2006-11-16 02:20:24
Subject: Postgres server crash
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-11-15 17:31:45
Subject: Re: Hundreds of database and FSM

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group