| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
| Date: | 2006-11-11 00:26:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200611101926.37313.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 10 November 2006 17:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Now the question is, do you guys really want to put in that much effort?
> > I am all for making as much things as easy as sensible. But imho
> > PostgreSQL is best served if you guys focus on what has distingished it
> > from MySQL. And that is providing a platform with superior SQL standards
> > completeness and compliance. And extensible framework that promotes user
> > choice over one size fits all defaults.
>
> I am still wondering why the PostgreSQL *community* is trying to compete
> with the MySQL *Corporation*.
>
Because the postresql *corporations* don't provide as many resources as the
mysql *community* ?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-11 00:39:40 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
| Previous Message | Leif B. Kristensen | 2006-11-10 23:58:16 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |