Re: On what we want to support: travel?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date: 2006-11-09 07:52:54
Message-ID: 20061109075254.GK90133@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:21:30PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> Granted, but we *struggle* for developers on a lot of the ancillary projects;
> Take phppgadmin vs. phpmyadmin for example; or take a look at some of the pl
> languages that don't have a full set of capabilities or have platform issues.
> We're not just in need of core developers or slashdot posters, we're still in
> need of rounding out the current postgresql ecosystem and we need new blood
> to do it.

Interesting... I've been pretty active in the community for a number of
years, but I can only think of 2 or 3 cases where projects asked folks
for help.

Projects that are looking for help should really post entries at
http://pgfoundry.org/people/
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-09 08:14:11 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-09 07:31:34 Re: On what we want to support: travel?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-09 08:14:11 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-09 07:31:34 Re: On what we want to support: travel?