Re: On what we want to support: travel?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date: 2006-11-02 17:42:53
Message-ID: 20061102174253.GD28643@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:03:51AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Well, there's a couple of "returns" in my mind: (a) the quantity and quality
> of additional community members we can gain, and (b) what it adds to making
> PostgreSQL a better ("more advanced") database.

Ok, good. Now we have two proposed (actually, I think three:
quantity and quality are different scales) measures of return on
investment. Now, what we need to do is to evaluate the weight of
each, and then we have some sort of ruleish thing to evaluate with.

I don't want to pretent, with the management fetishists of the world,
that these things are somehow objective, or even enumerable in the
sense that dollars are. But merely having an idea of what scales
"bang for the buck" is to be compared against is a giant step
forward.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Everything that happens in the world happens at some place.
--Jane Jacobs

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-11-02 17:48:06 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-02 17:03:51 Re: On what we want to support: travel?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-11-02 17:46:26 Re: -announce list administration
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-02 17:03:51 Re: On what we want to support: travel?