Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: On what we want to support: travel?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date: 2006-10-30 18:44:43
Message-ID: 20061030184443.GE16730@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:50:41AM -0800, Michael Dean wrote:
> indiosyncratic proposals seems somewhat unethical.  Perhaps I am wrong, 
> but wouldn't it be better if there were a document clearly specifying 
> spending priorities that was relatively accepted by consensus of a broad 
> group of pg'ers, and that an opportunity to qualify for these monies 
> could be promulgated to the broader group?

Now that you have restated exactly my goal for starting this thread,
perhaps we could move on to the substance of the question?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
		--Alexander Hamilton

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-10-30 18:59:20
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2006-10-30 18:43:33
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-10-30 18:59:20
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2006-10-30 18:43:33
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group