Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: On what we want to support: travel?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Dean <mdean(at)sourceview(dot)com>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>,Michael Dean <michael(dot)dean(at)speakeasy(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date: 2006-10-30 16:42:03
Message-ID: 200610301742.06117.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 16:50 schrieb Michael Dean:
> Ad hoc decisions by an appointed committee that is reactive to
> indiosyncratic proposals seems somewhat unethical.  Perhaps I am wrong,
> but wouldn't it be better if there were a document clearly specifying
> spending priorities that was relatively accepted by consensus of a broad
> group of pg'ers, and that an opportunity to qualify for these monies
> could be promulgated to the broader group?

That is the point of this discussion.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2006-10-30 18:43:33
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-30 16:31:16
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Chander GanesanDate: 2006-10-30 17:56:12
Subject: Re: $ Contribution vs $ Matching Pledge
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-30 16:31:16
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group