Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Mailing list problem?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mailing list problem?
Date: 2006-10-28 17:40:41
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-general
Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 19:05:01 -0300 Alvaro Herrera 
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> The one you sent me is from ~2 hours after the original post:
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:12:53 -0300
> The original was:
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:16:17 -0500
> I hate time zones, but if I'm right, the original was an hour earlier then the 
> second one that went through ... so was rejected due to it being a duplicate of 
> one that already went through ...
> Of course, that's assuming they are the same one ;)

No, I don't think that's the case, because I get the "POST" message just
after getting the actual message to the list.  I tried again, and sent
a test message, which was archived here:

Attached are the POST message and the message I got from the list.

I think the other message did not have matching dates because the
sender's machine doesn't have a sync'ed clock.  Mine is NTP'd.  (Also
this example is simpler because all times are in -0300).

Maybe you are right that there is a duplicate, but in that case then
it's something inside the mail handling that's causing
duplicates to be received by majordomo, because I *certainly* did not
send the message a second time.

Today I got a whole bunch of POST messages, all corresponding to the
messages I have received.

(BTW the clock at (which is my outbound SMTP)
appears to be 4 seconds ahead).

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2006-10-28 18:30:19
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum / pg_class
Previous:From: John DeSoiDate: 2006-10-28 14:54:51
Subject: Re: Swing JTable and ResultSet TableModel (with big resultsets)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group