Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-25 15:44:57
Message-ID: 200610251544.k9PFivr27991@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name
> > in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that
> > can be more easily updated.
> 
> I agree with that.  If we have statements about other projects in our
> docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those
> statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change.

I mention only Slony and pgpool as examples of replication types.  They
seem to have risen to high enough visiblity to do that. I have not
mentioned any other solutions.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-25 16:00:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2006-10-25 15:43:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-25 16:00:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2006-10-25 15:43:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group