Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)
Date: 2006-10-24 14:34:57
Message-ID: 200610241634.58888.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, so manufacture pg_config.h.win32 during tarball build and insert
> the version numbers at that point?  Yeah, that would work.  Actually
> the easiest thing would likely be to have configure build it the same
> way it builds pg_config.h, and then not remove it in "make
> distclean".

The libpq makefile contains ample precedent for preparing Windows 
specific files during tarball building.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-24 14:37:12
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
Previous:From: markDate: 2006-10-24 14:18:16
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group