Re: New hardware thoughts

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>
Cc: Ben Suffolk <ben(at)vanilla(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New hardware thoughts
Date: 2006-10-23 21:47:09
Message-ID: 20061023214708.GV26892@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:12:59AM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> Generally more disks at slower speed - 2 10K disks in raid 0 is faster
> than 1 15K disk. More disks also allow more options.

Not at writing they're not (unless you're using RAID0... ugh).
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve 2006-10-23 21:51:40 Copy database performance issue
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-23 21:36:41 Re: Vacuum and Memory Loss