David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:07:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > > At some point, we will find something where we will have to duplicate
> > > some large hunk of 5.8's functionality to support 5.6.
> > No, we won't; we are not in the business of fixing Perl bugs.
> My point exactly.
> > You haven't given any reason why someone who is using 5.6 and is
> > happy with it shouldn't be able to continue to use it with PG.
> In my experience, people aren't "happy with" 5.6. Instead, they've
> got a mandate to maintain support for it, and this could be an
> argument for upgrading.
Or an argument to dump PostgreSQL.
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-10-16 04:15:59|
|Subject: Re: Threaded python on FreeBSD|
|Previous:||From: Jeremy Drake||Date: 2006-10-16 03:36:25|
|Subject: Re: constraints in query plans|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2006-10-16 04:41:58|
|Subject: Re: BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column names which are not marked as UTF8|
|Previous:||From: Delight Chen||Date: 2006-10-16 01:42:06|
|Subject: BUG #2693: Abut SQL ASCII through JDBC|