Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-11 04:16:42
Message-ID: 20061011041642.GC9860@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> * MySQL is used as a primary development platform.
>
> > Another good reason.
>
> Actually that's *the* reason --- it's always going to be hard for
> Postgres to look good for an application that's been
> designed/optimized for MySQL. The application has already made
> whatever compromises it had to for that platform, and dropping it
> onto a different DB won't magically undo them.
>
> Some days I think database independence is a myth.

I do, too, but only on the weekdays ending in 'y' ;)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message quickcur 2006-10-11 04:51:16 left outer join on multi tables
Previous Message Luki Rustianto 2006-10-11 04:13:21 Re: restoring a file system backed-up data dir

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message quickcur 2006-10-11 04:51:16 left outer join on multi tables
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-10-11 03:36:27 Re: Index Tuning Features