From: | José Orlando Pereira <jop(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Replication hooks discussion |
Date: | 2006-10-02 12:44:53 |
Message-ID: | 200610021344.54211.jop@lsd.di.uminho.pt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 29 September 2006 20:02, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> At the beginning of the month, in
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg00453.php>,
> I said that I'd be willing to try to do any sort of co-ordination,
> document writing, &c. for a project that might define common back-end
> resources necessary for the various kinds of replication systems
> people seem to want.
>
> There seems to be a widespread agreement that there is more than one
> sort of replication facilities that are desired, and that none of the
> systems on offer satisfies all of those desires. There also seems to
> be a hope that we could come to some sort of agreement on what the
> necessary conditions for any of these facilties are. If we could,
> then we could build the necessary framework to provide those
> conditions, and it could be made available in the back end without
> every replication project having to be shipped with the main
> PostgreSQL code.
We at the GORDA project strongly agree with this approach. I'll try to
summarize our proposals on the new list.
Regards,
--
Jose Orlando Pereira
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaunak Godbole | 2006-10-02 14:30:59 | In which module does query rewriting takes place |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-10-02 12:19:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code |