Re: Replication hooks discussion

From: José Orlando Pereira <jop(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Replication hooks discussion
Date: 2006-10-02 12:44:53
Message-ID: 200610021344.54211.jop@lsd.di.uminho.pt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 29 September 2006 20:02, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> At the beginning of the month, in
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg00453.php>,
> I said that I'd be willing to try to do any sort of co-ordination,
> document writing, &c. for a project that might define common back-end
> resources necessary for the various kinds of replication systems
> people seem to want.
>
> There seems to be a widespread agreement that there is more than one
> sort of replication facilities that are desired, and that none of the
> systems on offer satisfies all of those desires. There also seems to
> be a hope that we could come to some sort of agreement on what the
> necessary conditions for any of these facilties are. If we could,
> then we could build the necessary framework to provide those
> conditions, and it could be made available in the back end without
> every replication project having to be shipped with the main
> PostgreSQL code.

We at the GORDA project strongly agree with this approach. I'll try to
summarize our proposals on the new list.

Regards,

--
Jose Orlando Pereira

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaunak Godbole 2006-10-02 14:30:59 In which module does query rewriting takes place
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-02 12:19:08 Re: [HACKERS] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code