Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Still need GUC update_process_title?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Still need GUC update_process_title?
Date: 2006-09-30 20:59:04
Message-ID: 200609302059.k8UKx4Z11945@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
We added GUC update_process_title (default is 'on') in 8.2 based on
tests Tom ran showing that there was a performance impact for the
process title.  With the new use of strlcpy(), is there still an impact
from process title?  Tom, would you run your tests again?  Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Steve SingerDate: 2006-10-01 00:14:25
Subject: 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-30 20:36:56
Subject: Re: libedit broke in head

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group