| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Casey Duncan <casey(at)pandora(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Date: | 2006-09-26 12:19:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200609261419.51433.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Casey Duncan wrote:
> Seems like the unit used for shared_buffers (and others) should be
> megabytes then with a minimum of 1 (or more). Is less than 1MB
> granularity really useful here?
Yes, there are platforms that allow as little as 512 kB of shared memory
by default.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-09-26 12:29:30 | Re: Block B-Tree concept |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-26 12:13:06 | Re: Block B-Tree concept |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-09-26 16:04:26 | Too many messages from Autovacuum |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-09-26 08:58:47 | Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests |