If you're going to yank it, please at least include a generator in
Personally, I'd like to see at least some kind of generator in core,
with appropriate info/disclaimers in the docs. A simple random-number
generator is probably the best way to go in that regard. I think that
most people know that UUID generation isn't 100.00000% perfect.
BTW, at a former company we used SHA1s to identify files that had been
uploaded. We were wondering on the odds of 2 different files hashing to
the same value and found some statistical comparisons of probabilities.
I don't recall the details, but the odds of duplicating a SHA1 (1 in
2^160) are so insanely small that it's hard to find anything in the
physical world that compares. To duplicate random 256^256 numbers you'd
probably have to search until the heat-death of the universe.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> Completely agreed. I can remove the function from the patch. The
> temptation was just too high not to include the new_guid() in the
> patch :)
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 10:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> > > Isn't guaranteed uniqueness the very attribute that's expected? AFAIK
> > > there's a commonly accepted algorithm providing this.
> > Anyone who thinks UUIDs are guaranteed unique has been drinking too much
> > of the kool-aid. They're at best probably unique. Some generator
> > algorithms might make it more probable than others, but you simply
> > cannot "guarantee" it for UUIDs generated on noncommunicating machines.
> > One of the big reasons that I'm hesitant to put a UUID generation
> > function into core is the knowledge that none of them are or can be
> > perfect ... so people might need different ones depending on local
> > conditions. I'm inclined to think that a reasonable setup would put
> > the datatype (with input, output, comparison and indexing support)
> > into core, but provide a generation function as a contrib module,
> > making it easily replaceable.
> > regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Jim Nasby jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2006-09-18 21:06:09|
|Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers|
|Previous:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-09-18 21:00:01|
|Subject: Re: minor feature request: Secure defaults during|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-09-18 21:13:27|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for UUID datatype (beta)|
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2006-09-18 18:33:17|
|Subject: cosmetic change in 'drop owned' reference|