Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Not sure. I don't think the shell command and the SQL command have
> > to provide the same feedback. I don't think createuser does. Does
> > vacuumdb?
>
> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the
> corresponding SQL commands.
>
> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright
> mistake.
Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
people liked it. I need someone else to say they want it reverted.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Robert Treat | Date: 2006-09-02 14:07:57 |
| Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Previous: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2006-09-02 13:49:16 |
| Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2006-09-02 14:25:15 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite types and result sets Sven |
| Previous: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2006-09-02 13:47:18 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE messages from REINDEX command. |