Re: Win32 hard crash problem

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 hard crash problem
Date: 2006-08-31 22:28:54
Message-ID: 20060831222854.GF6470@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> On 31-Aug-06, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >>Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>BTW, are you sure this is coming from JDBC? I see the exact same
> >>>message text in libpq:
> >>>libpq_gettext("server sent data (\"D\" message) without prior row
> >>>description (\"T\" message)\n"));
> >>>Maybe the JDBC driver uses the identical message wording but my
> >>>thought is to look for something going through libpq.
> >
> >>The error is server side. I was just describing the environment.
> >
> >I can entirely assure you that that error message is not present in
> >the server code.
> Well that's even more interesting because it doesn't exist in the
> jdbc driver either.

Conclusion: they are using libpq in some form, so you should investigate
that.

Is there a way to alter the tick counter, so that a test run does not
need to take the full 3 weeks?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-31 22:29:50 Re: updatable views and default values
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2006-08-31 22:17:45 Re: Win32 hard crash problem