On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:55:59AM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 31/8/2006 4:56, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> Frankly there are several projects on pgFoundry that need some advocacy
> >>> on this release including:
> >>> Full Disjunctions
> >>> .Npgsql (if it hits 1.0)
> >>> Orafce
> >>> Possibly some reiteration around:
> >>> pljava
> >>> pgpool
> >> Agreed, but we better mention it is on pgfoundry rather than in the main
> >> code.
> > Hmmm... agreed.. something like:
> > With the continued success of our community project site
> > www.pgfoundry.org we also have the following sub projects available for
> > 8.2...
> I'd expand that to -
> With the continued success of our community project site
> www.pgfoundry.org we also have the following projects developing
> additional add-on features to offer expanded functionality to what
> is included in the main PostgreSQL release. These features may be
> too cutting edge to be considered part of the main project or may
> just cater to a small market.
Nice expansion :)
I'd cut that last sentence, as it emphasizes a gap between the core
and pgfoundry that it's our long-term goal to close.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Remember to vote!
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2006-08-31 16:11:52|
|Subject: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD|
|Previous:||From: Shane Ambler||Date: 2006-08-31 15:25:59|
|Subject: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release|