[ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000720 ] SQLGetInfo SQL_DATABASE_NAME no info

From: <noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
To: noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000720 ] SQLGetInfo SQL_DATABASE_NAME no info
Date: 2006-08-30 21:33:39
Message-ID: 20060830213339.39D3086C67D@pgfoundry.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Bugs item #1000720, was opened at 2006-08-29 20:25
You can respond by visiting:
http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=538&aid=1000720&group_id=1000125

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Farid Zidan (faridz)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: SQLGetInfo SQL_DATABASE_NAME no info

Initial Comment:
Driver does not return database name for SQLGetInfo DATABASE_NAME

// database name
rc = SQLGetInfo( m_hdbc, SQL_DATABASE_NAME, m_szDatabaseName,
sizeof( m_szDatabaseName ), &nLenOut );

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hiroshi Inoue (hinoue)
Date: 2006-08-30 21:33

Message:
The driver has returned "" for the request because PostgreSQL didn't support database.schema.table notation (even schema
support was unavailable until 7.3). Though
PostgreSQL supports the notation in recent
versions, I'm not sure if the driver is safe
for the notation.

PostgreSQL is essentially a catalog-less
dbms. Though PostgreSQL allows the notation,
the only valid database is the current one.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=538&aid=1000720&group_id=1000125

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stijn Vanroye 2006-08-31 08:57:06 Re: Latest ODBC driver?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2006-08-30 21:11:35 Re: Latest ODBC driver?