On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:46:06PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> I'm not at all sure that these are the right changes to apply; it
> somewhat appears to me as though ecpg is supposed to be able to cope
> with the omissions.
Yor're right. It should cope with those. The database names were
ommitted by design.
It seems to me that it is working on the few buildfarm machines that
have it enabled so far. Mabye you still had an old preproc.y/preproc.c
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Chris Mair||Date: 2006-08-30 09:40:20|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] updated patch for selecting large results|
|Previous:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2006-08-30 07:59:01|
|Subject: Re: Updatable views|