> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >>> Is there any reason for Rtree circle ops not being included in
> >>> PostgreSQL?
> >> rtree is going away (has gone away in HEAD awhile ago, in fact).
> > I know. I just want to make sure that there's any technical reason it
> > had not been supported for long time.
> AFAIR, the code simply wasn't there before 8.1. I threw in an opclass
> definition for circles while adding the rtree-equivalent opclasses
> to GIST, because the use case for it was pretty obvious
> (distance-to-a-point type queries). We could have added the same
> opclass to rtree at the same time, but I saw no point given that we
> were planning to drop rtree in the next release cycle.
> > BTW, I seems there are some users who are willing to continue to use
> > Rtree.
> It's a bit late to be objecting to that decision.
Yes, probably the only way to help the user would be 1) build a new
pgfoundry or whatever open souce project 2) provide a commercial
support for him.
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2006-08-29 01:34:12|
|Subject: Re: Rtree circle ops|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-08-28 23:51:28|
|Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets|