| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 22:54:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200608282254.k7SMsDB16553@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
> > commands sent with \g use a cursor. This patch changes SendQuery
> > so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.
>
> That's what I remembered. I don't think we want to introduce a
> difference between ; and \g.
I am confused. I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
Tom, what *every* command are you talking about? You mean \d?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:06:38 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 22:47:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:06:38 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 22:47:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) |