Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors
Date: 2006-08-28 17:26:02
Message-ID: 200608281926.04419.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Wait a minute.  What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
> commands sent with \g use a cursor.  This patch changes SendQuery
> so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.

That's what I remembered.  I don't think we want to introduce a 
difference between ; and \g.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zoltan BoszormenyiDate: 2006-08-28 17:35:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-08-28 17:24:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Zoltan BoszormenyiDate: 2006-08-28 17:35:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-08-28 17:24:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group