Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors
Date: 2006-08-28 17:26:02
Message-ID: 200608281926.04419.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
> commands sent with \g use a cursor. This patch changes SendQuery
> so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.

That's what I remembered. I don't think we want to introduce a
difference between ; and \g.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2006-08-28 17:35:11 Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-28 17:24:05 Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2006-08-28 17:35:11 Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-28 17:24:05 Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO