David Fetter wrote:
> I think it's useful to mention what's arriving, what's being worked
> on, and what's not even being contemplated in the long term.
We don't even have a roadmap of any kind, so the last thing we can do is
put claims of that sort in the documentation.
> Similar troubles apply--on a smaller scale--to the information
> schema, SQL/OLB, SQL/JRT, etc.
The information schema is quite extensively documentated. If you have
something to add on OLB and JRT, then let's hear your suggestions.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2006-08-27 19:39:08|
|Subject: Re: Replication Documentation|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2006-08-26 20:31:08|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2006-08-27 09:55:06|
|Subject: Re: Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib|
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2006-08-27 07:40:30|
|Subject: Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql|