Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New XML section for documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New XML section for documentation
Date: 2006-08-26 18:41:32
Message-ID: 200608262041.33396.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I made it clear in the section that the XML syntax was being checked,
> not validation against a schema.  You want Check and Validation
> sections?

"Valid" and "well-formed" have very specific distinct meanings in XML.  
(Note that "check" doesn't have any meaning there.)  We will eventually 
want a method to verify both the validity and the well-formedness.

I think that a function called xml_valid checks for well-formedness is 
an outright bug and needs to be fixed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-26 18:42:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-26 18:38:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-26 18:42:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-26 18:38:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group