----- Original Message -----
From: alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com <Alvaro Herrera>
Date: 25.08.2006 00:50:59
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views
> Minor suggestion: change get_view_qualification_function to look the
> function by Oid rather than name. I wasn't sure it was actually a good
> idea to use a function that way, but if it's going to stay ...
> Another: remove create_nothing_rule, replace with call to
> Another: change hasRule to return a bool instead of an Oid.
> Another: instead of a comment like this:
> * XXX It seems to me that these checks are not necessary; and further,
> * they are useless. This is because the view is just being created,
> * thus it cannot have any rules before the ones we are going to
> * create.
> * XXX What about CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW ???
> have a single paragraph explaining why the replace flag is needed.
Okay, i'll sent a reworked version asap, but can't get to it before monday.
I'm away from my machine this weekend and have only sporadic access
to my email.
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Zoltan Boszormenyi||Date: 2006-08-26 19:36:14|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2006-08-26 17:21:49|
|Subject: Re: Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib|