| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jasbinder Bali <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Shared Objects (Dynamic loading) |
| Date: | 2006-08-24 09:11:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20060824091120.GA3230@1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:41:50PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> Is there a reason this server-side code is using ECPG instead of SPI?
To make sure it doesn't work? There is NO guarantee that ECPG will work
in this scenario.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-24 09:57:15 | Re: invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-08-24 07:51:28 | Re: [GENERAL] Shared Objects (Dynamic loading) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2006-08-24 11:40:12 | Re: protecting a database |
| Previous Message | ben sewell | 2006-08-24 08:01:06 | postgresql wildcard when parameter is -1 |