Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date: 2006-07-31 20:44:56
Message-ID: 20060731204456.GA67809@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:19:43PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > > The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple
> > > test now shows us outperforming mysql:
> >
> > Sweet ;-)
>
> I love this team. Kudos!

So now it's MySQL users' turn to say, "Sure, but speed isn't
everything...." :-)

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-31 21:46:45 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-07-31 20:19:43 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-31 21:03:35 Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-31 20:36:11 Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-31 21:46:45 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-31 20:36:11 Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update