Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

From: Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi(dot)ML(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Date: 2006-07-31 11:58:41
Message-ID: 200607311458.41716.Tzahi.ML@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-students
The patch was sent to [PATCHES] yesterday so hopefully it will get in
before the feature freeze.
It includes regression tests. 
Only some code documentation issues are left.
I almost finished it completely but i sent the patch first to
get it accepted before i'll merge the rest.

On Saturday 29 July 2006 22:23, Jim Nasby wrote:
> As Josh said, that's not how point releases work. It's fine to submit
> a patch that still needs some work, but you really need to get the
> initial patch in before Aug. 1st. Just mention any pending work in
> the initial submission (ie: still needs documentation, no regression,
> what-have-you).
>
> On Jul 29, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > I don't like last minute things so i'll pass on this one.
> > I am sure 8.2.x will come soon and i'll have another chance.
> >
> > On Saturday 29 July 2006 19:56, Robert Treat wrote:
> >> You need to send it as a patch to pgsql-patches for code review.
> >> Include a
> >> description of what it is and pointers on how to use it. Also make
> >> note
> >> that you think it should be added to contrib with reasons why.
> >> You also
> >> need to do this pretty much today... code freeze is Aug 1, so if
> >> something
> >> isnt seen before then, it's not likely to get in.
> >>
> >> Robert Treat
> >>
> >> On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:06, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> >>> Practically i moved it to beta.
> >>> I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve
> >>> the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished
> >>> feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it.
> >>> Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it
> >>> directly from pgfoundry?
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> >>>> Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in
> >>>> now? Should we be extending feature freeze?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> >>>>> My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i
> >>>>> want to
> >>>>> enter before people will start to use it but other than that i
> >>>>> tested it
> >>>>> extensively. It can take a few days.
> >>>>> still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1
> >>>>> dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2
> >>>>> but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult?
> >>>>> The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by
> >>>>> the end
> >>>>> of soc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into
> >>>>> contrib?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a
> >>>>> feeling people
> >>>>> will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many
> >>>>> aspects of
> >>>>> postgresql.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>>>>> SoC Mentors,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away.  Just to check, are
> >>>>>> there any
> >>>>>> SoC projects which look to be both:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and
> >>>>>> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near
> >>>>>> feature
> >>>>>> freeze
> >>>>>> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>         Tzahi.
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Tzahi Fadida
> >>>>> Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://
> >>>>> tzahi.webhop.info
> >>>>> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> >>>>> http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------(end of
> >>>>> broadcast)---------------------------
> >>>>> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> >>>> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> >>>> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------(end of
> >>>> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below
> >>>> 8.0, the
> >>>> planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> >>>> joining
> >>>> column's datatypes do not match
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >         Tzahi.
> > --
> > Tzahi Fadida
> > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> > WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> >                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

-- 
Regards,
        Tzahi.
--
Tzahi Fadida
Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at 
http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html

In response to

pgsql-students by date

Next:From: John JawedDate: 2006-08-21 18:27:33
Subject: Project status
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2006-07-29 19:23:38
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group