Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Subject: Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch
Date: 2006-07-30 02:13:10
Message-ID: 20060730021310.GA19036@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Here is a patch pursuant to there ideas.  The main change is that in
> GetSnapshotData, a backend is skipped entirely if inVacuum is found to
> be true.

Patch applied.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-07-30 02:16:27
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-30 01:50:03
Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-07-30 02:16:27
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-30 01:50:03
Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group