| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
| Date: | 2006-07-30 02:13:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20060730021310.GA19036@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here is a patch pursuant to there ideas. The main change is that in
> GetSnapshotData, a backend is skipped entirely if inVacuum is found to
> be true.
Patch applied.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-30 02:16:27 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-30 01:50:03 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-30 02:16:27 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-30 01:50:03 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |