Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

From: Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi(dot)ML(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Date: 2006-07-29 12:06:17
Message-ID: 200607291506.17407.Tzahi.ML@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-students
Practically i moved it to beta.
I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve
the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished 
feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it. 
Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it
directly from pgfoundry?

On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in
> now? Should we be extending feature freeze?
>
> On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i
> > want to
> > enter before people will start to use it but other than that i
> > tested it
> > extensively. It can take a few days.
> > still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1
> > dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2
> > but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult?
> > The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by the end
> > of soc.
> >
> > Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into contrib?
> >
> > Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a
> > feeling people
> > will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many
> > aspects of
> > postgresql.
> >
> > On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> SoC Mentors,
> >>
> >> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away.  Just to check, are
> >> there any
> >> SoC projects which look to be both:
> >>
> >> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and
> >> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC?
> >>
> >> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near feature
> >> freeze
> >> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >         Tzahi.
> > --
> > Tzahi Fadida
> > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> > WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> >                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match

-- 
Regards,
        Tzahi.
--
Tzahi Fadida
Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at 
http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html

In response to

Responses

pgsql-students by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-07-29 16:56:44
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2006-07-28 23:35:22
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group