Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Weekley <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock
Date: 2006-07-25 01:47:36
Message-ID: 200607250147.k6P1lar00589@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "John Weekley" <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net> writes:
> >> Platform is 64 bit Solaris x86.
> >> ...
> >> "../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h", line 814: #error: PostgreSQL
> >> does not have native spinlock support on this platform. To continue the
> >> compilation, rerun configure using --disable-spinlocks. However,
> >> performance will be poor. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
> >
> > It looks like s_lock.h currently has coverage for amd64 using gcc, or
> > sparc64 using either compiler, but not for amd64 using Sun's cc.
> > Please feel free to send a patch, or you could pester Sun to send us
> > one (Josh?)
>
> SunStudio is supported on the HEAD (8.2). Spin lock problem is know
> issue in version 8.1.4. I don't know if latest 8.1 branch contains
> backport.

No, we did not backport because of concern that not enough people
reviewed the changes.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Weekley 2006-07-25 02:32:20 Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-25 01:43:13 Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock