From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Weekley <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock |
Date: | 2006-07-25 01:47:36 |
Message-ID: | 200607250147.k6P1lar00589@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "John Weekley" <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net> writes:
> >> Platform is 64 bit Solaris x86.
> >> ...
> >> "../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h", line 814: #error: PostgreSQL
> >> does not have native spinlock support on this platform. To continue the
> >> compilation, rerun configure using --disable-spinlocks. However,
> >> performance will be poor. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
> >
> > It looks like s_lock.h currently has coverage for amd64 using gcc, or
> > sparc64 using either compiler, but not for amd64 using Sun's cc.
> > Please feel free to send a patch, or you could pester Sun to send us
> > one (Josh?)
>
> SunStudio is supported on the HEAD (8.2). Spin lock problem is know
> issue in version 8.1.4. I don't know if latest 8.1 branch contains
> backport.
No, we did not backport because of concern that not enough people
reviewed the changes.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Weekley | 2006-07-25 02:32:20 | Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-25 01:43:13 | Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock |