Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Time to scale up?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Time to scale up?
Date: 2006-07-24 14:35:08
Message-ID: 20060724113053.X1188@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 13:12 schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
>> A resolution to the problem would be to allow the core team to scale up.
>> More people are needed to support a more comprehensive set of features.
>> So why not create specialized teams that are part of the
>> core-development trust?
>
> I don't think trust or scaling or implementation languages are the real issue.
> It has been established that for a variety of reasons, smalls tools that can
> be combined work better than one big tool.  That is why the Linux kernel does
> not contain a windowing system.
>
> The issue you are facing is an issue of perception.  There are a number of
> ways to fix that, only one of which is including PL/Java into the PostgreSQL
> source distribution.  I was on the other side of the debate when we kicked
> out the JDBC driver, but today I think this was the best thing that could
> have happened, to both sides.  If you see any measures that we could take to
> make PL/Java look as good in the public eye as the JDBC driver -- certainly
> that is a reasonable comparison -- then I'm sure we can address them.

One thing that has been talked to death many times, but nobody ever seems 
to come up with a solution to, is pgFoundry, and how badly it is 
advertised / promoted ... so software packages over there seem relegated 
to a sort of 'no mans land' ...

I was just thinking of it, and kinda surprised nobody else has ... why not 
add a section to http://www.postgresql.org's main page for it?  We have 
two sections now: Latest News and Upcoming Events ... why not add a third 
one under that includes Latest News from pgFoundry?  that way, when a 
release happens, or project is added, its very prominently displayed on 
our main page?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-07-24 15:19:53
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Time to scale up?
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-07-24 13:47:30
Subject: Skype on users / sponsors pages?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-07-24 15:19:53
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Time to scale up?
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-07-24 12:29:22
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group