| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Date: | 2006-07-21 16:47:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200607211847.58355.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Robert Lor wrote:
> The user needs to have the flexibility to build a 32 bit PG binary
> even when he run the 64 bit kernel. If I understand you correctly,
> your suggestion will not allow a 32 bit binary to be built on a 64
> bit OS.
I'm not sure about the context. How do you control whether the
PostgreSQL binaries you are about to build end up 32 bit or 64 bit?
Presumably there is some default, and you switch it using CFLAGS or
LDFLAGS. Then it would make sense to let dtrace be controled by
DTRACE_FLAGS or some such. But what does dtrace do if no flag at all
is given?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | korry | 2006-07-21 16:51:55 | Re: Loading the PL/pgSQL debugger (and other plugins) |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-07-21 15:46:04 | Re: contrib promotion? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-21 20:53:18 | Re: BTree tid operators and opclass |
| Previous Message | Robert Lor | 2006-07-21 15:13:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace |