On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:42:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:39:05PM +0300, Petronenko D.S. wrote:
> >> Can i get data in postgre from non-postgre db?
> > The name is PostgreSQL or Postgres, not postgre.
> It might help to explain that the pronunciation is "post-gres" or
> "post-gres-cue-ell", not "post-gray-something".
The FAQ link I included gives the correct pronunciation and has an
MP3 of somebody saying it; I suppose I could have quoted the FAQ
item in addition to posting the link.
> I heard people making this same mistake in presentations at this
> past weekend's Postgres Anniversary Conference :-( Arguably,
> the 1996 decision to call it PostgreSQL instead of reverting to
> plain Postgres was the single worst mistake this project ever made.
> It seems far too late to change now, though.
Too bad :-(
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2006-07-13 06:26:45|
|Subject: Re: The name of the game|
|Previous:||From: John Purser||Date: 2006-07-13 03:49:41|
|Subject: Re: cron job failing with 'database "xyz" is being|
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2006-07-13 04:19:51|
|Subject: Re: 10 Years And Counting|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-07-13 03:42:54|
|Subject: The name of the game (was Re: postgre linkage with non-postgre db)|