| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
| Cc: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as |
| Date: | 2006-06-29 16:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20060629163256.GJ17241@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> The split make sense since clients often have powerful UUID utilities handy
> and hence have limited or no use for such utilities in the database (true
> for all .NET and Java clients). Some PL's will also enable such packages
> out of the box.
I agree about splitting the utilities, except that I think the database
should be able to generate UUIDs somehow.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-06-29 16:40:13 | Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys |
| Previous Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-06-29 16:29:24 | Re: Database connectivity using a unix shell |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-29 16:35:12 | Re: Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2006-06-29 16:22:35 | Re: Index corruption |