Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as
Date: 2006-06-28 18:12:17
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:49:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Personally I don't buy the misuse objection - we already have plenty of 
> things that can be misused. As long as there is a reasonable valid use 
> and we can make it portable enough, I think there is a good case for 
> including it.

Well, since Mark has one, how about we consider adding it in?

If nothing else, can you please put your stuff on pgFoundry so others
can find it, Mark?
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software    work: 512-231-6117
vcard:       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-06-28 18:16:29
Subject: Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-28 17:59:32
Subject: Re: Instability in TRUNCATE regression test

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Brad NicholsonDate: 2006-06-28 18:48:01
Subject: Strange Behavior with Serializable Transcations
Previous:From: Bill EatonDate: 2006-06-28 18:09:34
Subject: Re: unusual "relation xxx does not exist" problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group