On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:49:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Personally I don't buy the misuse objection - we already have plenty of
> things that can be misused. As long as there is a reasonable valid use
> and we can make it portable enough, I think there is a good case for
> including it.
Well, since Mark has one, how about we consider adding it in?
If nothing else, can you please put your stuff on pgFoundry so others
can find it, Mark?
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-06-28 18:16:29|
|Subject: Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-06-28 17:59:32|
|Subject: Re: Instability in TRUNCATE regression test |
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Brad Nicholson||Date: 2006-06-28 18:48:01|
|Subject: Strange Behavior with Serializable Transcations|
|Previous:||From: Bill Eaton||Date: 2006-06-28 18:09:34|
|Subject: Re: unusual "relation xxx does not exist" problem|