From: | Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
Date: | 2006-06-27 15:44:30 |
Message-ID: | 20060628.004430.78730345.y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:30:56 -0400
> Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > send() may take as long as 200ms. So, I think we should increase
> > SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.
>
> Why would that help? We won't be sending more than 8K at a time.
MSDN is,
Method2: Make the Socket Send Buffer Size Larger Than the Program
Send Buffer Size
....
Modify the send call or the WSASend call to specify a buffer size
at least 1 byte smaller than the SO_SNDBUF value.
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-27 15:45:53 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-06-27 15:31:20 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-27 15:45:53 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-06-27 15:31:20 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |