Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

From: Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: 2006-06-27 15:44:30
Message-ID: 20060628.004430.78730345.y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:30:56 -0400

> Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > send() may take as long as 200ms. So, I think we should increase
> > SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.
>
> Why would that help? We won't be sending more than 8K at a time.

MSDN is,

Method2: Make the Socket Send Buffer Size Larger Than the Program
Send Buffer Size
....
Modify the send call or the WSASend call to specify a buffer size
at least 1 byte smaller than the SO_SNDBUF value.

--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-27 15:45:53 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-27 15:31:20 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-27 15:45:53 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-27 15:31:20 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?