| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 |
| Date: | 2006-06-26 19:47:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200606261947.k5QJlG822878@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Oh, good point. Do we remove stats_command_string?
>
> You mean, remove the option to turn it off? I don't think so. Aside
> from whatever remaining overhead there is, there's a possible security
> argument to be made that one might not want one's commands exposed,
> even to other sessions with the same userid.
OK.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-26 19:57:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-06-26 19:46:24 | Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-06-26 20:12:55 | Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-26 19:10:03 | Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 |