Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:12:58PM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Ludek Finstrle wrote:
> > I make patch againist CVS after yours huge commit. What's your opinion?
> Is the second parameter of snprintf_add needed ?
> Aren't the parameter values always strlen(the first parameter) ?
You're right. I think more about it and "add" means add to the end
so I changed the patch as you pointed.
> Is snprintf_len needed instead of snprintf ?
> Though the current code ignores snprintf errors, it's simply
> my negligence..
I'm voting for keeping safer snprintf_len. But I can change it if
New patch attached.
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Ludek Finstrle||Date: 2006-06-14 08:09:34|
|Subject: Re: CVS and open cursor|
|Previous:||From: noreply||Date: 2006-06-14 07:49:16|
|Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000414 ] file based dns does not connect|