Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bitmap index AM

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Victor Yegorov <viy(at)mits(dot)lv>, Jie Zhang <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>, John Eshleman <jeshleman(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Postgres Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitmap index AM
Date: 2006-06-13 01:23:51
Message-ID: 200606130123.k5D1NpP01219@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Bruce,
> 
> We have a bitmap index AM in Bizgres (on PG 8.1.3) that is functional and
> achieves very worthwhile (10x+) performance and space objectives.
> 
> It is a large patch, and introduces the access method along with modifying
> the appropriate executor nodes.  The latter part was necessary because of
> the need to bypass the in-memory bitmap index when an on-disk bitmap is
> available.
> 
> Because this patch is large, how do you suggest we go through review?  Also,
> there is some further work that Jie is doing to support efficient
> multi-column indexes that will simplify the code, so we're not quite ready
> for patch submission.

Well, post a URL of the patch, and keep working on it.  When it is
ready, let us know.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2006-06-13 01:45:14
Subject: Re: minor fix of elevel in fd.c
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-12 23:15:14
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group