Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Name and datatype was just an example. I am trying to get people to
> actually provide feedback (thank you). Andrew brought up that also
> including the constraints would be a good idea which I agree.
You also need rules, triggers, inheritance, indexes, primary key
specification, foreign keys, default values, CHECK constraints, storage
configuration (i.e., "plain", "extended", etc), statistics
configuration. Maybe I'm still missing something. How do you do all
that with a single result set?