Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reindexdb command utlility

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Henrik Zagerholm <henke(at)mac(dot)se>,pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reindexdb command utlility
Date: 2006-06-08 00:55:17
Message-ID: 20060608005517.GB1429@timbira.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:

> Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*.  When we implemented the current
> elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
> 
Agreed.

> If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used.  But it doesn't (and this is
> not a request to add one).  Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one.  But
> not INFO.
> 
LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
better.


-- 
  Euler Taveira de Oliveira
  http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-06-08 19:36:33
Subject: Re: Pltcl can't install on windows
Previous:From: Jan CruzDate: 2006-06-07 23:56:22
Subject: length checking and encoding in postgresql 8.1.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group