Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
> Why is this an improvement? AFAIR an INFO message is *not suppressible*
> by adjusting client_min_messages, therefore this makes the system more
> chatty not less so. It certainly doesn't do anything to address the
> original complaint.
I thought it needed changing for consistency. Shouldn't status messages
like this be INFO:
test=> REINDEX DATABASE test;
NOTICE: table "pg_class" was reindexed
NOTICE: table "sql_languages" was reindexed
NOTICE: table "sql_packages" was reindexed
NOTICE: table "sql_parts" was reindexed
If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO.
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-06-07 17:17:01|
|Subject: Re: reindexdb command utlility |
|Previous:||From: Alexis Gabadinho||Date: 2006-06-07 16:03:52|
|Subject: Pltcl can't install on windows|