Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o
Date: 2006-06-06 07:53:27
Message-ID: 200606060953.30206.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 04:27 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Actually, the TODO item is very badly worded. The idea is to get rid of
> the spelling differences between postmaster and postgres options, and
> then there will be no need for '-o' because you'll just say what you
> want --- that is, "-o -foo" and "-foo" will be interchangeable.

This is already done.

I suppose that the idea was that the -o option should be phased out over a
couple of releases.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-06-06 09:02:19 table/index fillfactor control
Previous Message Victor B. Wagner 2006-06-06 07:51:35 Contrib module to examine client certificate